|
Are The New Bikes
Any Good?

2005
RM250 - a nice looking bike, but will there be hidden problems?
Hopefully I have caught your attention with a headline
grabbing title - because we do have a serious race bike issue to
discuss, that concerns an ever growing number of riders!
Winning Races
Year after year manufacturers R & D teams (research and
development), sweat away burning the midnight oil, to bring out
faster and better bikes - and to take our hard earned cash of
course!
And why - because we want to win races and want the best bike
to do it on. But even so, buying a bike that could help us to win
a race is getting even harder than it was many years ago!
I won't argue when it comes to the point that bikes are
becoming faster, more controllable and better suspended. Because
in those areas the manufacturers have done wonders. In fact most
modern race bikes are so 'rider friendly' that its never been
easier to ride a race bike well.
And as regards maintenance and reliability, well what can you
say. Disc brakes are so easy to maintain, cable controls - if you
still have them, seem to last forever. Once not so long ago, a
rider dare not go out without a spare cable strapped to the bike,
or a couple in the van.
So what's my gripe? - 1) Trackside
maintenance.

New Husky250 -
you can see the spark plug, but can you easily get at it?
Yes that’s right trackside maintenance. We all know ideally
we shouldn't have to do any, but unexpected incidents do occur -
and then when they do, we need to be able to fix the bike quick!
And this is where a lot of modern bikes do let us down!
Let me give you two examples that I have come across recently,
one of which ended up costing a rider a lot of money!
I was marshalling at a local Hare & Hounds race recently,
when I came across a very dejected rider in the woods staring at
his lifeless race bike. It was a 3 month old 250cc two-stroke from
a major manufacturer. Apparently it had misfired a few times and
then came to a halt.
After trying to kickstart it for ages, the rider had now given
up any hope of it magically starting and allowing him to continue
the 3 hour race.
It was an almost new machine and had been serviced regularly,
but even so all two-strokes can be liable to foul a spark plug.
Because of this, wise enduro riders always carried a spare spark
plug and spanner. But here's the rub; on this new bike, it was
impossible for either of to easily take off the spark plug cap to
use it to check for a spark. To 'simply' do this meant that first
the seat and then the fuel tank would have to be removed first.
Which would not only mean a long job timewise, but also that you
need to carry a complete toolkit around for this purpose. Not very
practical really - and you certainly wouldn't be able to do this
job and still get a good result in a race.

KTM's great little 200, but where is the
spark plug, its not on the left side?

You can just see the spark plug on the
right side of the KTM,
it's hidden deep inside between the hose and airbox and many
people can't manage to get the plug cap off or on properly.
But KTM are NOT the worst manufacturer for this problem!
But on an older race bike, checking for a spark or changing a
spark plug would take a few moments - and still leave you in the
hunt for a race win!
You can't plan for this, spark plugs and plug caps can fail at
anytime without notice - even brand new plugs. I have had this
happen to me many times in the past - but fortunately I was always
on bikes that made it quick and easy to check and fix!

The Spark plug and carburettor were so
accessible on this 1987 Husky 125.
The other modern 'can't fix quick' area is the carburettor.
Only last week a local championship level enduro rider and I were
going out for a bit of riding practice. As he wheeled his bike out
of Fort Knox and switched on the fuel tap to test run it before
loading up, petrol started pouring out of the carburettor overflow
pipe.
Sadly a quick tap on the float bowl side didn't stop it (or
twenty more!). Now what should and would have been a 2 minute job
to take the float bowl off and get at the float needle, was now
going to take quite a while on this new bike. As once more to fix
this simple job - the seat and tank had to come off - to allow the
top of the carb to be undone, so that we could twist the carb and
get at the stuck float needle inside.
Again we are not talking about poor maintenance. This bike and
rider I know well and he is so fastidious with bike checking and
preparation, because he knows he needs to be to race at the top
level and do well. To stop any chance of this happening he had
always run a fuel filter - but sods law had intervened and the
float needle still jammed.
Fortunately as we were still at home we had all the tools
needed - but he could have been in the middle of a competition!

2004 YZ250 - a
great bike, but can you get at the carburettor?
This was one more example of how a modern bike could let you
down in a race, by taking so long to fix - what would have been a
simple trackside problem on an older bike!

Older Honda200 4-stroke - with easy spark
plug access.
So what's my gripe? - 2)
Suitability for purpose.
Surely if we need to stand a chance of doing well in an event,
then we need a race bike that will allow us to do so!
Most modern race bikes have evolved for 'world class' riders to
win at international level MX or SX, not for average - or even
very good riders at your local club race!
Worse still, some are developed especially to impress magazine
and newspaper testers, who often expect to be sitting on an
uncontrollably wilder beast year after year. So that if the bike
is not vastly improved, at least they can still write really eye
catching headlines about it - after all that is what sells bikes
and we fall for it!
Now moving the fuel tank as low as possible may just give the
best in the world a bit of an edge, as regards lowering the centre
of gravity a touch - and therefore improving handling. Sadly I
suspect that 99% of riders could not actually tell the difference
- but again it looks good on the sales brochure: 'Fuel tank
lowered for even greater handling!'.
How about: 'Race day wiped out due to not being able to fix
a simple - but now inaccessible problem'!
I suppose it doesn't have quite the same ring to it ;o)
But sadly this type of experience is becoming more and more
common - and are you prepared to accept it when you have already
shelled out £4.500 for a new bike?
I am told that part of the reason many of you buy a new bike
every year, is to ensure that you have more of a chance of
actually finishing an event - without having bike problems and
also to cut down on maintenance and running costs!
So what's my gripe? - 3) The true
cost of it all
So what should have been a small job has not only cost you the
race and given you a bum day, but it has also cost you a lot more!
Recently my son sat down and worked out the true cost of racing
his 250 2-stroke at a fairly local Hare and Hound event. (for
those who don't know, a H&H event is a bit like a 3 hour
scramble.)
The following figures are averaged out over a series of local
races (which means they are day trips) - are conservative figures
and only a rough guide: -
| Entry
Fee: |
£
30 |
(
Local H&H race entry ) |
| Race
Fuel: |
£
18.50 |
(
16 ltr's pre-mix ) |
| Transport
costs: |
£
20 |
(
120 mile round trip) |
| License
Fee: |
£
5 |
(
approx ) |
| Tyres
Rear: |
£
30 |
(
2 x 3Hr races ) |
| Tyres
Front: |
£
6 |
(
6 x 3Hr races ) |
| Other
General bits: |
£
15 |
(
Oils, Brake pads, Chain/spkts, clothing, Bike damage, etc.) |
| TOTAL
RACE COST: |
£
124.50 |
|
And its not just enduro's that have these problems either.
What chance has an MX'er got for a good result when he stalls a
4-stroke and has to try and kick start it quickly? Never mind
losing a few seconds, it is not uncommon in this situation to be
lapped at least once!
Plus of course there is the big disappointment of it all. A
race that you have been waiting for and preparing for, for
months, the big day finally arrives - and you are sidelined
because of something so petty!
Of course new bikes are good, they are all very, very good
and so much better than bikes of twenty years ago that there is
no comparison. But they also have some serious design flaws and
the big question is -
Are YOU prepared to put up with it?
If you have any thoughts on this subject, or irritations with
dirtbike design that you would like to see changed, tell us about
it in Biker's Chat Forum in the 'Feedback' section.
Meanwhile I'll be sticking with my 16yr old race bike. (no
comments about me liking sixteen year olds please !!!)
Report and Pictures - Adrian Harris
|